He said She said

Page 24 #11 Reads: “I don’t know what it was, but it was definitely a handgun.”

This makes no sense. What happened was Mr Young turned to the Judge and said “I think he has a hand gun”. I clearly remember this as this was the only time I came close to losing my composure. Mr Young was making up another wild and unbelievable story. These fabrications were taken as facts, putting me in the position of having to prove they were lies. Given this, I spoke out in a loud manner challenging this wild new allegation. I believe I said “oh come on”. Mr Young’s statement has been altered and my statement deleted.

Page 29 #1-4 Reads: A. I went in, downstairs, sat down, had a beer, up and out. Q. Okay A. Did I scan your house? No, I did not. Q. The question was were you ever in my-”

When Mr Young was caught in a lie, i.e. he states in his disclosure given to us by the Crown, that he had never been in my home, he corrected himself by saying what he meant was he was never actually in my basement. I had found this strange that a person only feels he has been in a person’s home after he has been in ones basement. Mr Young states that he went downstairs, this is false. I know this because my basement was being used only to dry lumber from my sawmill and make gemstones. Seeing as I built the machine to make gemstones and would not allow anyone to see my trade secrets including several folks who asked to see it, it is not possible I would have let Mr Young view it. Not only did Mr Young say no as is attributed to him, he had never been in my basement.

Also on page 119 #18 Reads “john boy, fag, or sally boy”. Should read “jew boy, fag or sally boy”.

This is an example of just one word change can completely change the meaning.

Page 119 (on or about) Omission

I asked Mrs. Friolet “Did you ever see your husband damaging one of our fence posts”. She answered “No”.

I asked this because we have a video of her watching Mr. Young harassing me do this as she was standing on her back porch watching and listening to him doing these things.

Page 138 #5-10 “I was made aware of the accusation of the crossbow the night of the alleged fire assault. That is when Mr. Young told me I believe.’ (This is Officer Moore referring to his notes). Q. (Crown) This was November the? A. “The 4th. Q. “The fourth.”

We believe there may be a discrepancy there because both Mr. Young and Mrs. Friolet claim Officer Moore attended on or about 12 Oct 2005 and further, per Mrs. Friolet, “seizing the crossbow”.

Oh my God!!! Don’t get me started on this one!!!

Page 159: #32 Omissions

Noel also stated we had lots of pictures we had taken of Mr. Young and that we had given them to the police. That these incidents had occurred after the initial arrest and then looked at the Judge and said “we were not allowed to bring that up here”.

Page164- 166: Omissions

Page 166: Noel repeatedly stated regarding the alleged crossbow incident “nothing happened”, and “if something happened then I wrote it down, nothing happened that day”.

Page 176 in total. Examples below: (Also we believe some testimony may have been taken out of order which makes line by line analysis)

#3 Reads “On the last occasion here, Mr. Efremov, page 49 of the transcript indicated that he took pictures of the daughter and girlfriend of the daughter of Mr. Young. Were you aware of that?”

#7 Noel stated “not that I’m was aware of but if he said he did then he did.”

#23 Noel doesn’t not recall stating what is in the written transcript she does believe what she stated was “If he did I wasn’t aware of it”.

#31 Noel believes she stated that we had told them we would take pictures because at the time they were dealing drugs in the driveway.

In reference to the Judge referencing page 49 of the transcripts of which I had no copy for the second portion of the trial: I’m very sure I said “I went outside with a camera to shoo away the kids selling drugs.” The referenced transcript states as fact I was taking pictures of his daughter and girlfriend. I think this has been added. Where in the transcript is there evidence that this alleged statement is a fact given the police searched my home, camera and computer and recorded in their police notes that no pictures of the daughter had been taken. I tried to enter that in evidence however the Judge did not allow it.

Page 186: Omission
#10 The Judge stated that the testimony of the Police Officer Moore was iffy and not clear when he was stating Mrs. Friolet’s being more credible than anyone else. He also stated that he had two people saying it happened whereas only one (Noel) saying it didn’t and used the term 2 people vs 1. During that period he negated Officer Moore’s testimony that Officer Moore never did attend to the complaint of threatening Mrs Friolet with a crossbow as alleged by both Mrs Friolet and Mr. Young.