|
During the Cornwall Inquiry into the bungled cover-up of systemic child sexual abuse by civil servants within the Justice System in Eastern Ontario a victim was charged with Obstruction of Justice. We suspect the Crown that decided to maliciously prosecute this victim was Lee Burgess. If you recall, Lee Burgess found a way to drop 16 serious criminal charges laid against his colleague. We feel Mr Burgess is one of the biggest hypocrites in the Government of Ontario, while he himself obstructs justice 16 or so times, I collected all the overwhelming evidence of his colleague's crimes. My wife and I were the sole victims, so he had no right to drop the charges, as far as we knew I was going to conduct a private prosecution, Lee was not up to it. Given the facts and known previous actions we feel this abuse of process has Lee Burgess' finger prints all over it. From the public info online, it seems very clear to me, Lee Burgess' main reason for being a head crown is to attack victims of child abuse, while down playing crimes against Survivors. One issue that may be hard for you to comprehend is this; almost always we Survivors are not helped when we come forward, we are not believed and in many cases the people who are paid to help cause much more harm than help. So when we find or see a Crown, Judge or police that actually wants to help stop child abuse, we become very protective of them. Our view is simple, a police officer, Crown or Judge that protects sexually abused kids or stands up and says No to Child Abuse, is a rare and beautiful thing. Like a rare flower in a federal park, it must be protected, not by un-ethical or criminal means but by law. This 80 million dollar Inquiry making rich lawyers richer, which went from the conceptual idea of finding out why so many kids were abused at the hands of the Church and Justice System with nothing being done, has become what appears to all Survivors watching, an Inquiry into how the cover-up failed and what can be done next time to make sure the victims don't speak out. This is analogous, to the public demanding a stop to broken bones in little league hockey games and the government's response of removing all x-ray machines from hospitals. What we can tell from the Inquiry/Victim Inquisition transcripts, a brave Survivor came forward to help stop child abuse within the Justice System, his name was Steve P. Steve P, knowing that only Survivors know, care and understand the real problems, took it upon himself to check on the well being of a fellow Survivor, called A. Roy. Just as a lawyer will tell a client, if you are not sure, tell the truth and say you can't remember, Steve P trying to be both a friend of the court and supportive friend to a fellow Survivor said this. According to the official and unaltered transcripts, Steve P's attempt to be supportive to A Roy did not influence him at all, period. And he, Steve P, most certainly did not tell anyone to lie. Further, we know from Steve P that it was not his intention to influence anyone. And he didn't. We have heard from one lawyer, that given the evidence, the law education this lawyer received indicated that this very serious charge should not have even be laid. So how on earth could this have happened? Given that this Inquiry had a mandate to not have charges laid against those who abused kids and the others that covered it up? Given it's just basic common sense victims of child abuse should not be held accountable for crimes against them especially when they are victims of people in the position of legal or god-like authority. Lets again look at the official and unaltered transcript, oooh now we see. The Judge running this farce all but ordered the Survivor to be charged. What Crown would do such a dirty deed, I would bet it's the mass obstructor of Justice against Survivors himself, Lee "anti-Survivor" Burgess. I'll try to find out who would be so vicious and cruel to a friend of the court, who took it upon himself to try and make Ontario safer for it's most precious resource. Stay tuned. |