Jackie stated in Court she was unaware of Young's criminal activities against us.



As mentioned in another section of this site the Court informed me that I was not allowed to discuss the incidents of Mr. Youngs continued criminal activities that occurred while Mr. Young was under conditions of release after his arrest in November of 2005 including his activities against us during the trial. The Crown was well aware of Mr. Young's new assaults and breaking of conditions. Not being attorney's we assumed that the advisement was legal for some reason of which we were unaware. This warning prevented us from submitting into evidence a multitude of evidence that displayed a recurrent pattern of criminal intent all revelent to my defending myself against the false accusations against me by both Mr. and Mrs. Young. This video was one of the pieces of evidence that was surpressed. Note toward the end of the video Mrs. Young was out on the porch and could both hear and see what her husband was doing. When questioned in Court as to whether she had ever been aware of Mr. Young's activities she stated she was not.

Note the section of the transcript below. Although this portion of the transcript was altered it still indicates perjury as she was aware of what was going on. Although it would have been near impossible for her not to have heard his shoutings and seen at least some of his criminal activities as it occurred almost daily for at least 6 months, (she was, after all a 'stay at home wife' where 4 windows faced the driveway where he mainly confined his harassment activities). We were both able to personally view her observing his activities and also that day were able to capture her this time on video (see below you will note her presence on their porch behind a blanket toward the end of the video). (It's unfortunate we didn't capture her on tape the day she was in their van with her husband laughing as he was hitting a fence post with his van.)

To view Video click here

This file is quite large and takes a while to load. We suggest that you minimize this page while it is loading, turn up your volume so you know when the file has completed loading. In the meantime, feel free to browse some of the other pages as they will open in a new window and not effect the video being loaded. We suggest perhaps one of the following sections of interest: Selected Transcripts Time Line Judge Hunter Questionable Decisions Adam Zegouras in the News Witness giving contradictory evidence 136.(1) every one who, being a witness in a judicial proceeding, gives evidence with respect to any matter of fact or knowledge and who subsequently, in a judicial proceeding, gives evidence that is contrary to his previous evidence is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years, whether or not the prior or later evidence or either is true, but no person shall be convicted under this section unless the court, judge or provicial court judge, as the case may be, is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused, in giving evidence in either of the judicial proceedings, intended to mislead. Fabricating evidence 137. Every one who, with intent to mislead, fabricates anything with intent that it shall be used as evidence in a judicial proceeding, existing or proposed, by any means other than perjury or incitement to perjury is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. Obstructing justice. 139.(1) Every one who willfully attempts in any manner to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in a judicial proceeding, (a) by indemnifying or agreeing to indemnify a surety, in any way and either in whole or in part, or (b) where he is a surety, by accepting or agreeing to accept a fee or any form of indemnity whether in whole or in part from or in respect of a person who is released or is to be released from custody, is guilty of (c) an indictable offense and is liable to imprison for a term not exceeding two years, or (d) an offence punishable on summary conviction. Idem (2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner described in subsection (1) to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years. Return to Home Page View Selected Transcripts Section Return to Jackie Lies