|
During my closing statements, the Judge, who has stated publicly he thinks pot should be legal, expressing his concerns for folks, or kids for that matter, regarding places of purchase, interrupts me. He goes on, saying there is no evidence of the Young's drug dealing other then questions I asked. Well he is wrong. Having attempted to exclude all evidence or references to dangerous drug manufacturing he should have said questions he asked. See below when he asked Noel a question and she talks about the Young's selling drugs to kids. Further, look at the police report below. It clearly notes we believed (know for certain) he was selling dope. But the Crown knowing their witness Mr Young was growing, manufacturing and selling dope, had to find a way from preventing that truth from being told. They did this by ignoring written requests, for a pre-trial to subpoena of the other 7 police who didn't feel ignoring drug dealing, assaults, vandalism and criminal harassment should be allowed by Mr Tim Young. Further, we were ignored when we asked the Crown for a tv/vcr to be made available to the defence. Also the learned Judge would not allow us to enter any video taped evidence showing a ongoing pattern of drug dealing/manufacturing, assaults, breaches of court orders, criminal harassment and so on. It's very sad to be accused for something you didn't do by a proven liar and not even be allowed to enter any evidence of your overwhelming innocence. We know the Young's have done this to others at least twice sending people to jail. Wonder if their transcripts were altered also.    |