Adam Zegouras Questions OPP Officer Moore





So far on this page we have seen both crown witnesses, caught in blatant perjury. Now we have proof of Officer Moore's perjury.

First, I would like to say, I'm not happy about this page, I'm homeless, disabled, living way below the poverty line, in fear of the Crown's false witness and a few Bancroft OPP officers and I'm forced to appeal a wilfully wrongful conviction using a deliberately alter court transcript. I have to finance this appeal without money or legal aid, the little money I have which should go to pay for prescribed medications is diverted away to this attempted correction of an obvious, overwhelming and premeditated abortion of justice.

I have never done a violent thing in my life, the worst the government can say about me, is when he was young and escaping abuse he stole food to survive, and that over 20 years ago. While I was shot by the Peel Regional Police in my own home over 12 years ago, records show, I was cleared of all wrongdoing. To this day I don't have any answer why the Special Investigation Unit was not called, as is the law in Ontario. In my defence, I have always maintained:

a.) I was shot with my hands up in the internationally known surrender stance.

b.) I was shot because the Peel Police bungled a child abuse investigation informing me I should mediate with my rapists. I maintain, it's a crime to rape 12-year-old boys, mediation is not an option. When I refused, I was harassed, and then shot in my home. If you doubt this, I have included some of the Officer's notes from that case. Can you say shots fired? Officer Moore's tactics mirror what happened when I was shot. One interesting thing, court transcripts from that case was also altered. I was in great pain when brought to a courthouse; my words are still etched into my mind. YOUR HONOUR, THE POLICE SHOT ME, CAN I SEE A DOCTOR PLEASE?" That statement was removed from a certified transcript. I was treated for the injury at Maplehurst super jail. Now let me be clear, I was shot with Rubber Bullets, two different load strengths, however, this was at point blank range, had I not had my hands up I'd have been shot in the head and face. Let that be a lesson to others facing police corruption in Ontario, raising your hands when looking down the barrel of a shotgun have more than one benefit. I would like to say one thing my dad said about the Nazi's, during the war when his people liberated Europe and the Nazi death camps; not even the front line Nazi soldiers would shoot a Russian who surrendered with his hands up. My point, the police treat victims of child abuse worse than the Nazi's treated the Russians. They would rather shoot us with our hand up, then help us. Regarding the shooting incident, in the words of one of defence lawyer, Andy you had more Brass at the shooting then free donut day at Tim Hortons. They say all police together form a thin blue line, looking at Officer Moore I'd not call him thin or true blue, but would say he's lying. Look at the evidence you decide.

It's already been established, Officer Moore filed a false police report in support of Lee Burgess's quest for another wrongful conviction. Read the police report, read the altered transcript. Note, I remember confronting Officer Moore, his notes and police report in open court, saying "so that's a lie, isn't it Officer Moore" his reply was "no....That's a mistake". That has been removed or altered from the certified transcript. I sent a fax to the Attorney General informing him there were problems with the court transcripts. I have told two appeals Court Judges a total of three times the transcripts have been totally altered. On March 29 we are to be told when we can sit down with the Crown and Court Recorders and finally have them corrected and proceed to continue overturning this abortion of justice. But back to my proof, Officer Moore committed perjury. Remember use common sense and deductive reasoning, place yourself into my position, an Appeals Court Judge has stated I appear to be somewhat intelligent, I know I'm reasonable; view this evidence in that light.

Fact: Mr Young had already admitted in front of Noel and I he damaged my truck; the repair bill was $3500.00. Mr Young kicked my truck door in front of us.

Fact: Officer Moore has had a prior relationship with the Young family, as witnesses in at least one of the Officer's court cases. Possibly as many as 3.

Fact: We were so scared that when Mr Young was accosting me, breaking a work light, threatened to kill me and assaulted me, by
a) throwing a handful of rocks at me,
b.) bumping into me refusing to leave my property telling me to make him,
we had to call 911 while Mr Young was rummaging through my truck.

Fact: Although we told the 911 operator we had a tape of what happened, told Officer Moore we had a tape, he could spare no time to wait for me to locate the exact place on the tape.

Fact: When Officer Moore decided to break provincial guidelines, and ask Mr Young to make partial restitution, in lieu of pressing criminal charges for threatening death, vandalism, assault, mischief and trespassing by giving us $5.00 dollars, incensed I gave it back as it was insulting and very wrong. He dropped it on the dining room table and quickly left the scene. Noel and I will both swear to that, if Officer Moore offers to take a polygraph, we will also. WE WERE FURIOUS he did this.

Fact: Within minutes of Officer Moore leaving, I started writing a fax to the Commander of the OPP detachment in Bancroft, voicing our outrage at this very dangerous police solution, to these documented crimes. For a copy of the fax click here.

Fact: Because Mr Young was not held accountable, we were subjected to months of criminal harassment, attempted arson, vandalism, death threats and video taped assaults.

Fact: Officer Moore falsely recorded in his notes and at least one police report a major falsehood that casts doubt on everything he noted after that point.

Now then, Officer Moore given all these facts, would you have me, the learned Judge Hunter and god, believe that Noel and I are so stupid, we were happy to receive $5.00 for $3500.00 dollars damage to my truck, and this $5.00 also was enough to bribe us or sway us from our right, desire and need to be protected by the law. Given that both Noel and I were not protected when we were kids, our need to be taken seriously now is much greater than yours. Can you possibly believe this lie? Officer Moore stated under oath, that we appeared to be happy; this is a blatant lie and is perjury. Given all the above evidence, the principals of justice, our backgrounds, our anger at this situation and; Officers Moore's only proof, his self serving opinion that we appeared happy, how can you not conclude this is perjury. Do we sound happy at any point to you, would you be happy? This statement that we were happy defies belief and reason. For a 25 year Constable in the OPP to even suggest such a foolish thing is an insult to all police officers and citizens of Canada.

Until this is addressed, we must accept perjury is permitted in our Courts, and that only means our system is broken and needs to be overhauled. While we wait, wrongful convictions will occur and criminals will get away with serious violent crimes, as was the documented case here.











Listen to 911 tape



Officer Moore's Occurrence Report





General Occurrence Report


Ontario Provincial Police

Printed. 2006/01/11 11: 12 by 5978

Occurrence: SP05146926 Threats @2005/08/12 00:08

Author: #5978 MOORE, M
Report time: 2005/11/25 20: 16

Entered by: #5978 MOORE, M
Enter Time:


Remarks:

Benchmark: no

Complaint: Tim Young reports that his neighbor at #53 Sprucedale St. in Cardiff is making noise.

Incident location: #53 Sprucedale Street, Cardiff.

History: This is a situation where both parties share a common driveway and their garage is one building, The residences are very close together and lends itself to confrontations.

Investigation: Attended at the scene and spoke to Young, He advised that his neighbor has been working on something and making a lot of noise and he can't sleep/

Spoke to neighbor Andy Efremov who was working on a portable sawmill, he agreed to stop and not work on it anymore at such a late time.

FOLLOW UP OCCURRENCES: The next occurrence was on the 1 st of September in which Efremov called and advised that Mr. Young had damaged his light. Police attended and the two parties were bickering and Efremov had put up a yard light that is motion activated. It is shining right at the front of Youngs residence. Every time Young opens his door the light comes on. Young had grabbed a ladder that a trouble light was on as Efremov was working in his garage and the bulb on the light had broken, Young made restitution of $5 for the bulb and Efremov was happy with the conclusion.

Young complained that Efremov had taken pictures of his daughter and himself and had put them on the internet. Young also said that Efremov has a large dog which he lets loose and he is afraid of the dog.
On the 4th of November 2005 at 0032hrs. Police were called to #53 Spruce to a fire/assault. They arrived and the fire dept. was on scene. There was no fire and no assault, the yard light had either fallen over or was knocked over and had started to melt some of the shingles on the roof of Mr. Efremov's half of the

Printed by: 5978
Date: 11/01/200611:12
Page 1




garage, there had been an occurrence on halloween in which the light had been broken. Efremov feels that Young had knocked the light down. When Young was spoken to he said that he had tried to use a broom handle to change the direction of the light and it fell.

Young said that Efremov had had his dog out and uses the dog to intimidate him he has a new baby in the house and is very fearful that the dog will cause harm. He also advised that on the 11th of October 2005 at approx. 2230hrs. Efremov had pointed a crossbow at his wife as she stood in the kitchen window. Efremov was at his side of the garage when he had done this.

Both parties were spoken to by police and a resolution was tried to be struck via mediation meeting with police. at the time both parties agreed to mediation. A date was set for 20Nov05, both parties attended but Efremov was not prepared to proceed with mediation until he spoke to his wife. A meeting was subsequently set for 24Nov05 at 1900hrs. at the Bancroft a.p.p. Det. Young attended at 1900hrs and we waited for 1.5 hours for Efremov, Const. Dickson called Efremov via phone and could not come to an agreement with him to mediate.

As a result both parties are being charged for similar offences.

Arrest: Efremov was arrested on 25Nov05 at his residence and transported to Bancroft Detachment where he was photographed and fingerprinted and' released on a P.T.A. and an O.I.C. undertaking with conditions

Court for Efremov:24 Jan06

Printed by: 5978
Date: 11/01/2006
11:12 Page 2




Return to Home Page


View Selected Transcripts Section


Return to Time Line